The 3rd annual UX Awards took place on May 21, 2013 in New York City (see Figures 1-5). I had the pleasure of interviewing Beverly May, UX Awards founder, to learn what inspired her to start the awards, how she went about doing so, and what she’s learned from the experience.
Mindy Maxwell: Please tell us a little bit about yourself and your background.
Beverly May: I’m an Internet 1.0 veteran with a broad foundation spanning graphic design, web and software development, project management, business analysis, and every role in between. I’ve worked at a wide range of companies: startups, agencies, software shops, publishing houses, and government agencies. I went to the Interactive Telecommunications Program at Tisch, New York University. A few years later, after finishing business school at Oxford University, I founded my own UX and product strategy consultancy, Oxford Technology Ventures (OTV), in NYC in late 2008. Before I got into the web, I worked as a music promoter and started a music promotions and production company when I was twenty. Putting on large-scale, highly orchestrated events is something I am very, very familiar with.
MM: What inspired you to start the UX Awards?
BM: I had the idea for the Awards in 2009, but didn’t really pursue it seriously until 2011. I felt there was still confusion about what UX was, as well as skepticism from both business leads and technologists about the value of UX. The UX Awards event was created to help address this confusion by articulating the value and importance of UX through clear best-in-class examples, and by providing top industry practitioners as panelists. The initial main goal was to help legitimize and evangelize UX to the broader tech and business community, while a secondary aim was to celebrate and provide leadership within the UX community.
Three years later, I think the value of UX has finally been understood more broadly, with the success of such high-profile startups like Pinterest, Tumblr, and Kayak. These companies’ successes are based almost entirely on user experience. With UX as a concept becoming more understood and definitely more valued, I believe the role of the UX Awards has shifted to focus more on professional and industry thought leadership: best testing practices, cutting edge trends, case studies, and so on. It’s our night and our celebration, and it should be an event we all find both inspiring and stimulating.
MM: How did you go about founding the event?
BM: I reached out to the New York chapters of UXPA and IXDA and asked if there was interest in a collaborative awards event along with NYC-CHI. I have always felt that the Awards needs to represent the entire UX community and be viewed as a fair, transparent, and credible event that reflects the range of our communities’ abilities and showcases truly outstanding work. Each organization was represented on the jury. The first year we were still fairly collaborative and open in terms of how we might judge entries and manage the event. Now, it’s a more streamlined process since we’ve worked out a lot of the kinks and hurdles and have a clearer mission.
MM: What kind of challenges have you encountered when organizing the event?
BM: There are challenges every year: balancing juror representation, managing sponsor requests and needs, recruiting sponsors, raising awareness outside of NYC, recruiting submissions, promoting the event, and paying for the event. There are also all of the last-minute details, such as coordinating winning submission videos and presentation assets and planning the event reception.
One of our biggest challenges is a perception that UX Awards is a NYC-only event. To have the event be relevant, it can’t be simply NYC-centric, even if the actual Awards are held there. We promoted the event heavily at SXSW these past two years and held a special SXSW Meetup this year. We’ve also promoted the event at IXDA’s Interaction 2013 and IA Summit 2013. We are considering making the event bicoastal, such as one year in San Francisco, one year in NYC. In the future, we might align ourselves with a broader UX organization, too. We’ve made progress in changing the perception of the Awards as being a NYC-only event, but we need even more global awareness to really have the desired impact.
MM: Can you share any lessons learned?
BM: The UX audience is incredibly critical and tends to be focused on each tree in the forest. This isn’t surprising given that our professional role is to analyze something and determine how it could be better. It’s hard for many of us to be enthusiastic when we see even minor flaws and to recognize them in context. The same applies to the Awards. The Awards are there to help celebrate accomplishments. No project, even the Grand Prize winners, is perfect. We need to learn to couch our criticism and recommendations in context.
MM: In your opinion, have the Awards been a success?
BM: I think the 2013 Awards were successful. The event had a good flow, positive feedback, high-caliber jurors, and high-caliber submissions and winners. This is the first year that I really felt like it came together and was what it should be as an event. The first two years were decent in context, but like any project, we needed to iterate to get to where it needed to be.
MM: What do you think the Awards reveal about the current state of UX?
BM: Each year a theme emerges from submissions that reflects the state of the industry and current trends. 2013 revealed our march towards ubiquitous computing with winning projects in areas like electric car customization and management, home automation devices, digital prosthetics, and mobile voice- and touch-enabled software. It’s an interesting time to be in UX if you understand UX to be any kind of digital input experience that will increasingly extend beyond a screen or graphical layout.
MM: So, what’s next?
BM: We’re wrapping up UX Awards 2013 and already in the early planning stages of the 2014 event. If you’re interested in sponsoring or getting involved, please get in touch! You can also follow the Awards on Twitter @UXAwards, or join our mailing list at UserExperienceAwards.com.
2013 UXAwards Winners
- GRAND PRIZE for Best Everyday Utility: Google Now by Google
- GOLD for Best Digital Media Transformation: Helsingin Sanomat Digital Transformation by Cava Interactive for Helsingin Sanomat
- GOLD for Best Social Learning Platform: Actively Learn by Schema Design, LLC for Actively Learn, Inc.
- SILVER for Best Accessibility Innovation: Activ by students at Virginia Tech
- SILVER for Best Consumer Device: WeMo by Belkin
- SILVER for Best UX Research Process: Cessna – We Have Your Jet by Digitas for Cessna
- SILVER for Most Useful Consumer Health Care Service: ZocDoc by ZocDoc
- BRONZE for Most Persuasive Use of Data: Water For People by EffectiveUI for Water for People
- BRONZE for Best Clinical Healthcare Experience: PowerChart Touch by Cerner Corporation
- BRONZE for Best Classroom Learning Experience: Amplify Tablet by Amplify
- USAToday.com site redesign by Fi for Gannett
- PUMA Joypad Wall by kbs+ Spies & Assassins for PUMA
- BMW ActiveE by kbs+ Spies & Assassins for BMW North America
- American Express Consumer Digital Acquisition Journey by Huge for American Express
- Nike+ FuelBand by R/GA for Nike
- RealSpend by SAP
Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/ux-awards-past-and-present/
Comments are closed.